CONTENTS
------------------
Editors' Note
------------------
Articles
Bishnupriya Ghosh, "The Postcolonial Bazaar: Thoughts
on Teaching the Market in Postcolonial Objects"
Alec McHoul, "Cybernetymology and ~ethics"
Benjamin Friedlander, "Poetics, Polemic, and the Question
of Intelligibility"
Kevin McGuirk, "A.R. Ammons and 'the only terrible health'
of Poetics"
Evgeny Pavlov, "What We Talk About When We Talk About
Poetry: A Recent View from St. Petersburg"--A Translation of
Arkadii Dragomoshchenko's "On the Superfluous"
------------------
Reviews
Rita Barnard, "Another Country: Amnesia and Memory in
Contemporary South Africa." A review of Jeremy Cronin, _Even
the Dead: Poems, Parables, and a Jeremiad_. Cape Town: David
Philip, 1997; and Sarah Nuttall and Carli Coetzee, eds.,
_Negotiating the Past: The Making of Memory in South Africa_.
Oxford UP, 1998.
Robert Elliot Fox, "Shaping an African American Literary
Canon." A review of _The Norton Anthology of African
American Literature_, Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and Nellie Y.
McKay, general editors. New York: W. W. Norton, 1997.
Includes an audio companion compact disc with 21 selections;
and _Call and Response: The Riverside Anthology of the
African American Literary Tradition_. Patricia Liggins Hill,
general editor. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1998. Includes
an audio companion compact disc with 26 selections.
James S. Hurley, "Real Virtuality: Slavoj Zizek and
'Post-Ideological' Ideology." A review of Slavoj Zizek, _The
Plague of Fantasies_. London: Verso, 1997.
Todd M. Kuchta, "The Dyer Straits of Whiteness." A review of
Richard Dyer, _White._ London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
Theresa Smalec, "The Therapeutic Stage/Page: Facts and
Fictions about the Dead to Stir the Living." A review of
Peggy Phelan, _Mourning Sex: Performing Public Memories_.
London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
------------------
Traffic
Kelly Cresap, "Ride the Classics 'Coast to 'Coast"
[WWW Version only]
Joel Weishaus, "IMAGING EmerAgency: A Conversation With
Gregory Ulmer"
------------------
Letters
------------------
Notices
[WWW Version only]
------------------
Notes on Contributors
------------------
Abstracts
Bishnupriya Ghosh, "The Postcolonial Bazaar: Thoughts on
Teaching the Market in Postcolonial Objects"
o Abstract: Much of the contemporary soul-searching by
postcolonial intellectuals living and teaching in first
world locations has circulated around the question:
does the institutionalization of the postcolonial
evacuate it as a gesture/movement of resistance to
continuing western imperialism? Taking the single
act of choosing literary texts, I chart the itinerary
of the postcolonial as it travels through critical
discourses, popular cultures and the media, public
spheres, and academic policies and pedagogies. Framing
my inquiry in current debates on the postcolonial and
the postmodern, I tackle questions such as: what is the
purchase of the "postcolonial" in the American academy?
How is literary value assigned to texts in terms of the
transnational publishing/distribution networks,
epistemological and educational histories in
postcolonial contexts, and the doling out of symbolic
sanctions? What kinds of political responsibilities
do postcolonial intellectuals have and to whom? In the
postmodern era of global cultural economies,
intersecting and deterritorialized public spheres, and
the saturation of those spheres with electronic
reproductions/mass media harnessed to dominant
(financial, military, institutional) interests, surely
the politics of culture must be reconceptualized in
transnational terms.
My analysis offers a two-pronged approach to negotiate
the problems cited here: first, the need to "teach the
market" along with the text and, second, the practice of
an international cultural studies. Teaching the
politics of the academy, pedagogy and the publishing
industry, the relationship of academia to international
public spheres, and the intersections of all kinds of
cultural work with critical theory, along with our
choice of postcolonial texts offers ways to recuperate
the postcolonial as cultural/political resistance.
While as critics we take on an immense task of cultural
imagination that charts, analyzes, critiques and
catalogs, as teachers we must hunker down to a set of
strategies that combat institutional and market
constraints.--bg
Alec McHoul, "Cybernetymology and ~ethics"
o Abstract: By working from the etymology of the word
"cybernetics" and its variants, this paper opens up the
question of the ethics of the cyber as its "ethos" in a
quite specific sense. That ethos has to do with the
ways in which all things cyber are far from being the
antithesis of the "human." On the contrary, in Wiener's
original sense, which refers to "the entire field of
control and communication theory, whether in the machine
or in the animal," the cybernetic includes the human.
However, this does not mean a complete identity between
humans and those few machines that are also and
incidentally cybernetic. The human capacity for
reflexive accounting marks a critical difference.--am
Benjamin Friedlander, "Poetics, Polemic, and the Question of
Intelligibility"
o Abstract: In this paper, I address the uneasy balance
between critical and poetic language and the potential
contradiction between these two modes of expression that
poets entertain when they set about writing their
"statements of poetics." More specifically, through a
close reading of Ron Silliman's brief essay "Wild Form,"
I show how such statements enact this uneasy balance and
resolve this potential contradiction most decisively in
their underlying formal patterns. In the case of "Wild
Form," this underlying pattern takes the
quasi-dialectical shape of two see-saws balanced on a
third see-saw, a pattern which bears a strong
resemblance to the quasi-dialectical progression of
Silliman's long poem _Tjanting_. It is this formal
resemblance, I argue, more than the polemical content of
"Wild Form's" various statements, which vouches for the
continuity and seriousness of Silliman's work. Indeed,
given the willingness and even eagerness with which
Silliman embraces the risk of confusion, it is only by
attending to such structural repetitions that the deeper
aspirations of his critical and poetic projects can
become intelligible.--bf
Kevin McGuirk, "A.R. Ammons and 'the only terrible health' of
Poetics"
o Abstract: Since the early 1980s, critics have typically
defined the postmodern in poetry by opposing the
postmodern text (usually the long poem) to the
postromantic lyric. It's interesting, then, that while
his critics divide into a group of lyric critics (Bloom,
Vendler, et al.) and a few %isolatos% working out the
operational procedures of his longer poems, A.R. Ammons
has worked in both modes since the early '60s. This
essay examines a different opposition within Ammons's
writing: on the one hand, the "swarming profusion"
(Ashbery) of brief lyrics and longer poems together; on
the other, a handful of much-anthologized *works*, poems
that in cadence and statement propose to transcend the
open totality of his poetry by knowing it better than it
knows itself. In his verse "Essay on Poetics" (1970),
Ammons declares that "abandonment / is the only terrible
health." The lyrics, accordingly, are mere trials and
re-trials which repeatedly abandon the romantic drift
toward epiphany, while the long poems aggregate but
refuse to comprehend. Taking the late elegy "Easter
Morning" as my example of a *work*, I argue that Ammons
elaborates not simply two literary modes, but two
discursive healths or "fatalities": the fatality of
death (with its correspondent elegiac *work*); and "the
only terrible health" of abandonment which is, in
Baudrillard's sense, a continuing fatality because it is
banal. In the first, the object is the subject's
mirror; in the second, the object is not the subject's
mirror, and so the poem must again and again abandon
both the object and the poem of the object. In
returning to the scene of childhood loss, "Easter
Morning" proposes to close a circle and resolve the
problem of the whole poetry, but can do so only by being
incommensurable with it.--km
Evgeny Pavlov, "What We Talk About When We Talk About
Poetry: A Recent View from St. Petersburg"--A
Translation of Arkadii Dragomoshchenko's "On the
Superfluous"
o Abstract: Today poetry is something unnecessary,
*superfluous*. Confined within the conventional bounds
of *writing*, it has been barred from naively
questioning its own nature and the limits of its scene.
Yet poetry does not err in any projection of its
questioning itself because it is the unconscious of a
society, the four-dimensional landscape of an impeccable
action. It is the fullest *absence*--above all, of
representation. Meanwhile, the desire for
absence--stasis, Logos, Fullness, death--is accompanied
by the insurmountable fear of transgressing the line
that separates from it. The poetic non-journey of
non-transgressive transgression is always a return to
its own beginning. It is the experience of
insufficiency. Every word, even if preceded or
followed by another, speaks of "not connectibility,"
"not compatibility," of rupture. "On the Superfluous"
is a paratactic rumination on poetry and parataxis. It
examines the residual surplus of insufficiency that
poetry accumulates in the idle melancholy of its endless
beginnings.--ep
|