CONTENTS
------------------
Editors' Notes
------------------
Articles
Carol Loranger, "'This Book Spill Off the Page in All
Directions': What Is the Text of _Naked Lunch_?"
Krzysztof Ziarek, "Love and the Debasement of Being:
Irigaray's Revisions of Lacan and Heidegger"
Joe Amato, "Technical Ex-Communication: How a Former
Professional Engineer Becomes a Former English Professor"
Jim Finnegan, "Theoretical Tailspins: Reading 'Alternative'
Performance in _Spin_ Magazine"
Patrick McGee, "Terrible Beauties: Messianic Time and the
Image of Social Redemption in James Cameron's _Titanic_"
------------------
Review Essay
Marcel O'Gorman, "Friedrich Kittler's Media Scenes--An
Instruction Manual." A review of Friedrich Kittler, _Literature,
Media, Information Systems: Essays_. Amsterdam: G+B Arts,
1997.
------------------
Reviews
Claudia Sadowski-Smith, "Contesting Globalisms: The
Transnationalization of U.S. Cultural Studies." A review of
Fredric Jameson and Masao Miyoshi, _The Cultures of
Globalization_. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 1998, and Lisa Lowe and
David Lloyd, _The Politics of Culture in the Shadow of Capital_.
Durham, NC: Duke UP, 1997.
Mark Sanders, "Postcolonial Reading." A review of Gayatri
Chakravorty Spivak, _A Critique of Postcolonial Reason:
Toward a History of the Vanishing Present_. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard UP, 1999.
H. Kassia Fleisher, "Of Tea Parties, Poverty Tours, and
Tammany Pow-wows; or, How Mr. Clinton Distanced Us All
from Pine Ridge." A review of Philip J. Deloria, _Playing
Indian_. New Haven: Yale UP, 1998.
Michael Alexander Chaney, "An Academic Exorcism." A review
of Cary Nelson and Stephen Watt, _Academic Keywords: A
Devil's Dictionary_. New York and London: Routledge, 1999.
Donald F. Theall, "Memory, Orality, Literacy, Joyce, and the
Imaginary: A Virtual History of Cyberculture." A review of
Darren Tofts and Murray McKeich, _Memory Trade: A
Prehistory of Cyberculture_. North Ryde, NSW: A 21*C Book
published by Interface, 1998.
David Banash, "The Blair Witch Project: Technology,
Repression, and the Evisceration of Mimesis." A review of _The
Blair Witch Project_. Dir. Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez.
Perf. Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Michael C.
Williams. Artisan Entertainment, 1999.
------------------
Related Readings
[WWW Version Only]
------------------
Bibliography of
Postmodernism
and Critical Theory
[WWW Version Only]
------------------
Notices
[WWW Version Only]
------------------
Notes on Contributors
------------------
Abstracts
Joe Amato, "Technical Ex-Communication: How a Former
Professional Engineer Becomes a Former English Professor"
o Abstract: This piece is an autobiographical
excursion detailing parallels between Fortune 500
America and the increasingly privatized
postsecondary institution. The author, an English
professor and a former practicing engineer,
narrates recent events on his campus---a growing
budget deficit, his own precarious position as an
instructor of technical writing---as these events
correspond to his industrial experience. Some time
is spent discussing a book, _The Idea of Ideas_,
authored by former Motorola CEO Robert Galvin, a
powerful Board member at the author's campus. This
book was distributed to faculty, unsolicited,
ostensibly to secure financial backing from Galvin,
and perhaps to encourage adoption of CEO-management
values and objectives. The upshot of the piece is
that privatization is intimately bound up with views
toward language--or, in the eyes and ears of the
corporation, communication.--ja
Jim Finnegan, "Theoretical Tailspins: Reading "Alternative"
Performance in _Spin_ Magazine"
o Abstract: "Theoretical Tailspins" maps the
boundaries of Andreas Huyssen's concept of the
post-avant-garde as the "hope" of postmodernism by
reading _Spin_ magazine's reporting and
dissemination of contemporary "alternative"/Gen X
youth culture scenes in a Cultural Studies context.
Working through Spin's coverage of Riot Grrrl
subcultures in the 1990s, I seek to put into practice
Michael Berube's claim that perhaps the single most
important and difficult challenge for contemporary
Cultural Studies practitioners is to think through
the problematics that arise when academics theorize
popular audiences and subcultures who may be
already theorizing themselves (_Public Access_ 151).
Reading across _Spin_'s layout, advertisements,
and articles in the early 1990s, my article takes
up the way _Spin_ more broadly theorizes and
historicizes itself as a masscult mouthpiece of, for,
by, about, and "from the perspective of" Generation
X. For many people with personal investments in
youth subculture scenes _Spin_ represents at best
a laughable example of counterfeit "alternative"
culture and at worst the very enemy of genuine
subcultural resistance, the thing that threatens to
rob a subculture scene of its essence of
oppositionality. While these are valid concerns,
a closer look at the constitutive role of mass
media in constructing subcultural identity leads me
to conclude that, sometimes by design and sometimes
in spite of itself, _Spin_ does manage to articulate,
in the vague name of Generation X, a popularized
form of Cultural Studies criticism. The _Spin_ model
offers a form that combines (sub)cultural opposition
and mainstream fun, and it's a form that proved
itself capable of keeping pace with the shifting
forces of cultural Reaganism and the New Right in
the late 80s and early 90s. The _Spin_ model might
therefore function as a counter-balance to the
infinite adaptability presumed to be the defining
characteristic of so-called "late capitalism": its
apparently endless capacity to appropriate
any-and-all forms of subcultural resistance,
oppositional meanings, or semiotic critique.--jf
Carol Loranger, "'This Book Spill Off the Page in All Directions':
What Is the Text of Naked Lunch?"
o Abstract: This essay seeks to initiate the
adaptation of some methods of textual scholarship
to postmodern studies by considering how
approaching a literary text as a sequence of
material events occurring over time affects
understanding of that text and its multiple contexts.
Because its purpose is to suggest, rather than limit,
possibilities, the essay is limited to a single
illustration--adapting the old-style practice of
publication history to what might be considered the
grand-daddy of postmodern texts: William Burroughs's
_Naked Lunch_. After itemizing and comparing the
contents of versions of the novel published between
1959 (the suppressed _Big Table_ excerpts and
Olympia Press edition) and 1992 (Grove Weidenfeld
trade paperback and the last edition released before
Burroughs's death), each version of the text is
read in terms of the implications of the
rearrangement, addition and deletion of gross
textual elements on the public and critical
understanding of the novel--its aura, subject,
narrative, and place in contemporary letters.
Detailed tabulations of the contents of these
editions and of Burroughs's revisions and
reordering of the _Big Table_ version accompany
the history. Additionally, the mythology of the
creation of _Naked Lunch_ and the successive
historical events which led the text to
metastasize are treated as part of the
text-as-event. _Naked Lunch_ is then briefly
compared to other aleatory texts in terms of
their politics of authority and ownership as
expressed within and enacted by the material
texts. The comparison suggests--as Burroughs's
novel graphically illustrates--that, while
attention to surfaces and weakening of historicity
are elements of the aesthetic of postmodern
left-political utterance, inattention to these
elements by postmodern theory effectively strips
the text of its force.--cl
Patrick McGee, "Terrible Beauties: Messianic Time and the Image of
Social Redemption in James Cameron's _Titanic_"
o Abstract: This essay employs Walter Benjamin's
theory of the dialectical image and Jacques
Lacan's refinement of the Freudian theory of
wish-fulfillment to analyze a popular work of mass
culture as a historical symptom. I argue that in
order to understand the social impact of James
Cameron's _Titanic_, it is necessary to look
beyond the dialogue and plot to the cinematic
images. The fate of the Titanic is well-known and
the story of forbidden love between a rich woman
and a poor man is a formula; but these conventions
are combined with negative images of the class
system that, on the one hand, lure the secret
desire of spectators for social transformation and,
on the other, affirm their fear that such
transformation may bring about unwarranted
destruction and death. The contemporary audience
is captured by the dialectical relation between
the image of the Titanic as it is today, an actual
wreck beneath the sea which Cameron photographs as
a piece of reality, and the image of what it was
and what it represented, a dream ship, a totalizing
commodity that answers the social demand for a
reality that works. The dream ship articulates the
class system as the fantasy of an order in which
everything and every person have their proper
place and value without contradiction or conflict--
in other words, without the unsolicited intrusions
of desire. The movie shows, however, that such
unsolicited desires are the necessary by-product
of the fantasy that tries to contain them. This
collision between fantasy and desire is the dramatic
crux of the film that finds its image in the
apocalyptic destruction of the Titanic. The
pleasure spectators take fromn the movie suggests
that images of terrible events can support
socially affirmative desires for change. These
images also play a critical role in the "action"
supergenre from which Cameron's _Titanic_ ultimately
derives.--pm
Krzysztof Ziarek, "Love and the Debasement of Being: Irigaray's
Revisions of Lacan and Heidegger"
o Abstract: Recalling his own formulas of sexuation
and his understanding of desire, Lacan points in
_Encore_ toward a possibility, even a need, of
rethinking love in connection with a certain
jouissance and in terms of the revised notion of
being as para-being. _Encore_ opens a path to
thinking the ethics of love outside of the
mirroring enclosures of narcissism and the
effects of sameness associated with the idea of
the One. This reformulation of ethics pivots on
the distinction between two senses of possibility:
on the one hand, possibility conceived as deferred
presence or enacted as repeated lack; on the other,
possibility taken as a temporal project of the
relation to the other, which never becomes a
matter of a substantive, an object, or a
signified, and cannot be conceived as lack.
Irigaray's _An Ethics of Sexual Difference_,
seen as a response to _Encore_, explores the
collapse of these two possibilities in terms of
the turn from wonder to the logic of lack, lack
which desire keeps repeating and knowledge tries
to supplement. To underscore the difference
between desire and wonder, Irigaray reformulates
the very notion of relation to the other into a
new, non-appropriative mode of relationality which
is not encompassed by desire, narcissistic or
fusional love, or the labor of the negative.
Considering Irigaray in the context of Heidegger's
thought, I reformulate her redefinition of the
relationality of love in terms of a rethinking of
Dasein into an ethical, non-appropriative event of
being-two. Heidegger's understanding of logos as
a saying prior to signification makes it possible
to envision a notion of relationality alternative
to both the Hegelian logic of desire and the
Kantian positing of das Ding. The futural
relationality in terms of which Dasein
understands itself as being-in-the-world breaks
free of the dialectical labor of the negative, at
the same time that it does not entail positing the
real as unchangeable or inaccessible. Such a
futural-transformative modality of relatedness
allows Irigaray to articulate the being-two of
love as a relation in which difference marks
itself neither in terms of negation nor separation
but as the transformative interval, as the
proximity that keeps reformulating the very
parameters of relation and obligation to the
other.--kz
|