CONTENTS
------------------
Editors' Note
------------------
Articles
Terry Harpold, "Dark Continents: A Critique of Internet
Metageographies"
Lee Morrissey, "Derrida, Algeria, and 'Structure, Sign, and
Play'"
Paula Willoquet-Maricondi, "Fleshing the Text: Greenaway's
_Pillow Book_ and the Erasure of the Body"
Robert Miklitsch, "Rock 'N' Theory: Autobiography, Cultural
Studies, and the 'Death of Rock'"
Bruce Robbins, "Celeb-Reliance: Intellectuals, Celebrity,
and Upward Mobility"
------------------
Interview
Cynthia Hogue, "Interview with Harryette Mullen"
------------------
Reviews
Steven Helmling, "Jameson's Postmodernism: Version 2.0."
A review of Fredric Jameson, _The Cultural Turn: Selected
Writings on the Postmodern, 1983-1998._ Verso: London
and New York, 1998; and Perry Anderson, _The Origins of
Postmodernity._ Verso: London and New York, 1998.
Patrick Cook, "Cyberdrama in the Twenty-First Century."
A review of Janet H. Murray, _Hamlet on the Holodeck: The
Future of Narrative in Cyberspace._ New York: The Free
Press, 1997.
Francois Debrix, "Post-Mortem Photography: Gilles Peress and
the Taxonomy of Death." A review of Gilles Peress, _Farewell
to Bosnia._ New York: Scalo, 1994; _The Silence._ New York:
Scalo, 1995; and Gilles Peress and Eric Stover,_The Graves:
Srebrenica and Vukovar._ New York: Scalo, 1998.
Adele Parker, "Living Writing: The Poethics of Helene
Cixous." A review of Helene Cixous and Mireille
Calle-Gruber, _Helene Cixous, Rootprints: Memory and Life
Writing._ Trans. Eric Prenowitz. London: Routledge, 1997.
Jason Evan Camlot, "The Couch Poetato: Poetry and Television
in David McGimpey's _Lardcake_." Toronto: ECW, 1997.
------------------
Related Readings
[WWW Version Only]
-----------------
Bibliography of
Postmodernism
and Critical Theory
[WWW Version Only]
-----------------
Notices
[WWW Version Only]
-----------------
Notes on Contributors
-----------------
Abstracts
Terry Harpold, "Dark Continents: A Critique of Internet
Metageographies"
o Abstract: This essay analyzes a series of cartographic
visualizations of the historical diffusion of the
Internet, as an example of the complicity of techniques
of scientific visualization with the contrasting
invisibility of political and economic formations.
Borrowing the term from Martin Lewis and Karen Wigen's
recent study of mapping discourses, _The Myth of
Continents_, I propose that these depictions of network
activity are embedded in unacknowledged and pernicious
"metageographies"--sign systems that organize
geographical knowledge into visual schemes that seem
straightforward (how else to illustrate global Internet
traffic if not on images of the globe?), but which
depend on historically-and politically-inflected
misrepresentation of underlying material conditions.
Those conditions are discernible in these maps, I
propose, only by a contrarian reading: a decentered
regard by which the maps (and the very logic of mapping
itself) may be seen to describe--*though only
indirectly*--an emerging, virtual "dark continent"
specific to our historical moment. This new political-
symbolic structure traverses and fragments prior
political entities, even as it makes use of fantasies of
national identity.--th
Lee Morrissey, "Derrida, Algeria, and 'Structure, Sign,
and Play'"
o Abstract: Now that, reportedly, "deconstruction...
is dead in literature departments today"--as Jeffrey
Nealon writes in _Double Reading: Postmodernism after
Deconstruction_--it may be possible to reconsider its
"birth," particularly the commonly accepted notion that
Derrida's work avoids, overlooks, or prevents a
relationship with history and/or politics (22). By
considering Derrida's "Structure, Sign, and Play"
(1966) in terms of the relationship between Paris and
Algeria or Francophone North Africa--what the recent
History of Structuralism calls "the continental divide
of structuralism" (Dosse 264)--this essay argues that
the recent focus on politics has been there from the
"beginning." Where "Structure, Sign, and Play"
tentatively claims that "perhaps something has occurred
in the history of the concept of structure that could be
called an event," and answers the obvious question--
"what would this event be then?"--with the cryptic claim
that "its exterior form would be that of a rupture"
(278), this essay, on the one hand, treats the Algerian
liberation as that rupture, while on the other,
considering the cryptic, tentative tone of "Structure,
Sign, and Play" as symptomatic. By "playing" with
Derrida's "Structure, Sign, and Play" (1966) essay in
terms of the "liberation" of Algeria (c. 1962), what
emerges is a Derridean argument much more politically
and historically aware than his work is generally
thought to be, especially in the earlier essays.--am
Paula Willoquet-Maricondi, "Fleshing the Text: Greenaway's
_Pillow Book_ and the Erasure of the Body"
o Abstract: Peter Greenaway's incorporation of other art
forms in his films has become a trademark of the British
artist. His references to, and uses of different media
within a work and across works make him a mixed-media
and multi-media artist. Most critics have focused on
Greenaway's pastiche renderings of paintings by famous
artists. More specifically, Greenaway's particular
brand of intertextuality and quotations of paintings
has been shown to be at the service of his own
reflections about cinema--a medium he proposes to
redefine. Greenaway has been called a self-conscious
"auteur" who makes art "out of ideas about art." What
Greenaway redefines through his "art-about-art" is not
simply cinema, but more broadly speaking,
*representationality* itself. His references to art
history are but particular manifestations of his
comprehensive investigation of what it *means* to
represent. His films and other art-works explore the
ways humanity has sought to represent itself and the
world--through images, objects, words, sounds, and
bodies. My analysis focuses on two of these
representational means which Greenaway explores in his
1996 film, _The Pillow Book_: the written word and the
body. I begin with an investigation of the Oedipal
resonances of the story. I then examine Greenaway's
portrayal of the written word by drawing from the work
of David Abram--a meditation on the impact of the
phonetic alphabet on our perception of, and relation
to, our bodies and the "body" of the world. The gradual
divorce of language from its natural referents--the
human body and the land--which Abram describes is, I
argue, analogous to the split of the Subject from
the totality of Being brought about by the Subject's
entry into the symbolic. Furthermore, this split is
also the central motif of the Oedipus legend--a mythical
construct which has served as the master narrative of
our particular patriarchal civilization. In abandoning
its roots in the living body of the Earth that nurtures
it, this civilization has inscribed itself in a deadly
narrative of biospheric proportions. I thus conclude
with an elucidation of the explicit references Greenaway
makes in the film to ecological concerns, and propose
that _The Pillow Book_ brings the written word and the
body together in a deadly embrace.--pwm
Robert Miklitsch, "Rock 'N' Theory: Autobiography, Cultural
Studies, and the 'Death of Rock'"
o Abstract: This essay is structured like a record--a 45,
to be exact. While the A side provides an anecdotal and
autobiographical take on the origins or "birth" of rock
(on the assumption that, as Robert Palmer writes, "the
best histories are... personal histories, informed by
the author's own experiences and passions" [_Rock &
Roll_11]), the B side examines the work of Lawrence
Grossberg, in particular his speculations about the
"death of rock," as an example or symptom of the limits
of critical theory when it comes into contact with that
%je ne sais quoi% that virtually defines popular
music ("It's only rock 'n' roll, but I like it, I like
it"). By way of a conclusion, the reprise offers some
remarks on the generational implications of the
discourse of the body in rock historiography as well as,
not so incidentally, some critical, self-reflexive
remarks on the limits of just the sort of auto-
historical "story" that makes up the A side.--rm
Bruce Robbins, "Celeb-Reliance: Intellectuals, Celebrity, and
Upward Mobility"
o Abstract: Critiques of the so-called academic star
system, this essay argues, often confuse the genuine
injustices of the way academic labor is currently
organized (especially the most pressing of these, the
tendency toward a two-tiered structure of employment)
with matters of celebrity and intellectual influence
that are related to it only very tangentially. These
critiques also rely, strangely, on the meritocratic
presuppositions of the seemingly discredited ideology
of self-reliance. My own critique of the anti-celebrity
critics tries to understand confusions about celebrity
as expressions of a deeper and more general ambivalence
about self-reliance and upward mobility. To that end,
it discusses the role of the patron/mediator in the
self-reliance tales of Horatio Alger (an erotically
ambiguous figure who reflects the split of interests
and causes that go into the hero's rise) along with
mediation by the media itself in the case of celebrity
Oprah Winfrey. Both cases, the essay proposes, are
about the articulation of social forces (rather than
individual merit) that determine the protagonist's rise.
And in both cases, that rise turns out to be about the
nature of the society risen into. The essay concludes,
finally, that the most pertinent backdrop and causal
context for these upward mobility narratives, if a
paradoxical one, is the rise of the social welfare
state, which is also the proper target of efforts to
improve the situation of academic labor.--br
|